🌟 Were you surprised when you subscribed to my page? If yes,..

🌟 Were you surprised when you subscribed to my page? If yes, What were you surprised by? What were your prior expectations about me and my page? 💕 The year is almost coming to a close, which means I will send those who spam like my posts, some nice sexy content. ❤️ — Here’s my solution to how to find a partner lol How to find a partner You have a finite amount of time and potentially unlimited options, and so there must be ways to assess people and whether they would make an appropriate partner (“relationship material” or be a worthy investment). It's good to establish a baseline where there are non-negotiable characteristics that must be reached (we can set the baseline to 50%) -- and we have the qualities we are willing to compromise on. Once involved in a partnership, we can make a list of their personal assets and liabilities — measure it using the baseline. Each quality is assigned a value (the higher you rate a trait, as you would guess, gives it a higher value) and do the same for the liabilities: the assets add to the baseline and the liabilities will subtract from the calculation of the baseline + assets. (Flaws of my model: Even if we accept the premise that an individual can be reduced to a set of characteristics, this model discounts the impact of variable interaction. The combination of two or more characteristics may produce a reaction in both parties that is greater than the individual reactions of each separate characteristic.) My thought process when writing this was centered on the issue of Optimal Stopping, which is a decision making problem that one is confronted with when faced with a line of potential options. As a rational actor, we preferably would like to choose, when possible, the best of those options. Decision-making, in this case, requires the accumulation of data and some form of relative standard by which the data extracted from the potential options can be compared with that of the other. When choosing a partner, we judge them by drawing comparisons between previous partners, crushes, or potential love interests. However, a rational decision involving love (oxymoron?) cannot always be made by comparison because there are other factors pertinent to our courtship conundrum. If we do not want to decide our fate with a mate in this way, we can always apply the Threshold Rule where there is a set percentile that the potential love interest must make or exceed before they can be considered. I see this as the baseline (non-negotiable qualities that an Individual must possess in order for me to seriously consider them as a potential match — an example of a highly ranked characteristic is a certain type of intelligence — analytic and logical thinking is a favorite). Anyone below this baseline is simply not entertained. There are qualities that are desirable, but not necessary, as long as they are above the baseline of what I consider to be acceptable (such as attractiveness — age fades, beauty becomes a bore, and intelligence infinitely entertains...). The problem with finding the Optimal Stopping time is when the so-called “best” option has been rendered long gone within the search itself or that the time, holding value in the sense that it implicitly contains gains and losses, (gains when time is used wisely and the time spent toward a goal amounts fruitfully rather than a loss, which is when one has wasted their time striving for a goal, receiving nothing in return) Is considered to be a loss due to the fact that the tedious hours spent toward the pursuit of the “perfect” partner could have been used more productively.